***Bling****

Message

NRath · #11 Post by **NRath** » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:42 pm

Hmmm, maybe... My first refurb was an '02 cable clutch Cannibal with the holes closed. Had to drill them. But, it was a re-furb, so the frame may have originally went out as an FX.

2000ex · #12 Post by **2000ex** » Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:08 pm

That is probably correct

wistech · #13 Post by **wistech** » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:30 pm

Nerf bar holes solid,stack of dimes weld beads ,and more pieces on the rear frame spars sure make it look like an fx400.

NRath · #14 Post by **NRath** » Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:17 pm

QUOTE (Wistech @ Feb 26 2010, 03:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

more pieces on the rear frame spars...

What extra pieces are there?

It might help if I actually looked at the auction, but it's blocked here at work. They don't want us scoring any good deals while at work!

wistech · #15 Post by **wistech** » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:24 pm

I might be mistaken on that one. I could have sworn that the rear spars were made with more pieces at the top on the early ones but I think They are just more pronounced due to the welds.

claas900 · #16 Post by **claas900** » Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:02 pm

QUOTE (Wistech @ Mar 1 2010, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I might be mistaken on that one. I could have sworn that the rear spars were made with more pieces at the top on the early ones but I think They are just more pronounced due to the welds.

No your right the early ones have an extra piece at that joint.

wistech · #17 Post by **wistech** » Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:33 pm

Thats what I thought but I was just looking at my ST Anthonies quad and its an fx400 frame but is built just like my 02 moto frame (except for the nerf bar holes, A arm joints and weld quality. . I wonder if there was a cutoff point in the fx production?