lt 250 r suzuki

[BSLEETER]

QUOTE (jinx44 @ Feb 11 2008, 05:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I have owned a couple. The later ones are not bad bikes, but stay away from 85-86 LT250Rs unless you can get them extremely cheap.

yeah, i found a deal on ebay-86 and a 92 complete 250s came with 3 topends 2 bottom ends and 2 extra frames---1500 bucks 500 miles awy though dont know if it would be worth it

[g9901920]

thats not to bad as long as nothings bent/ nice thing about two strokes is the fact that they are extremly simple and easy to work on and they are still quick so i would actually reccomend a 2 stroke. thats just me though.

[BSLEETER]

QUOTE (g9901920 @ Feb 13 2008, 03:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

thats not to bad as long as nothings bent/ nice thing about two strokes is the fact that they are extremly simple and easy to work on and they are still quick so i would actually reccomend a 2 stroke. thats just me though.

yeah, i love my cousins 88 and 95 banshees.....that is when they run, 2 stokes never start worth the **** so i'd rather have a 4stroke

[g9901920]

if they are not starting then the jetting is wrong, simple adjustment the bike should start first kick.

[Dachshund]

QUOTE (g9901920 @ Feb 13 2008, 04:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

if they are not starting then the jetting is wrong, simple adjustment the bike should start first kick.

Yep, I have 250R ATV's and 1 kick warm and 2 kicks cold.

[exlt250r]

you just have to watch alot of parts from the 85-86 not the same as the 87 to 91 are almost the same 92 they changed the swingarm shock setup I have a 90 and my brother has a 92 and the only difference was the rear end. Never had any problems with mine start 1st or 2nd kick all the time just wanted a four stroke so bought a cdale and love it.